Skip navigation.

Improving the User Experience for Desktop Sysadmins - Sabayon

GNOME
GNOME

Seth wrote: The three immediate design stakeholders in the 'enterprise desktop' are: end users, help desk staff, and desktop system administrators. Most design work for GNOME has gone into improving the end user experience, which is really the dominant stakeholder of those three. Some improvements aimed at end-users, like promoting preferences instead of settings you can get wrong, have also made life a little easier for help desk staff (as people are that much less likely to hose things). Recently Mark's work on Vino has added a very large improvement for help desk staff: the ability to remotely view and operate user's desktops (there is nothing more frustrating than blindly stepping people through computer operations over the phone).

So what about sysadmins? Sabayon is GNOME's first major design targeted at improving the user experience for people who administer GNOME systems, and hopefully the start of an initiative toward designing for this important group of users...

Read the rest

NIH syndrome

>Get real. The ideal situation would be to have one common way to do >this in both desktops so that I can control and lock down kde apps >within Gnome and viceversa. Kiosk is a great tool and Gnomers seem >to be having a very bad case of the not-invented here syndrome, a >syndrome which drove many a great company into the ground.

Unfortunately. Second good example: DCOP reimplementation - much hyped D-BUS. If there was some functionality lacking have they asked for implementing it? Nope, they just went and reimplemented. Now it is called 'standard' for some reason. Compare this to KDE devs stance to GNOME technologies. For example Amarok getting gstreamer backend. No cries about GNOME origins, no pretending that it does not exist, they just went and implemented it. Honestly, sometimes GNOME devs sometimes behave like bunch of kids.